Interesting debate. The chart is so American of the ‘Right on super parent’ variety which really grates on British ears.
I certainly agree that all children, without exception, need boundaries and I also think that it doesn’t really matter if those boundaries are widely or narrowly set. What matters is consistency. What children really hate is unfairness, so, if a sanction is the consequence of bad behaviour, it needs to be implemented (however, never threaten anything you can’t carry out!) and if there is a reason for prohibiting something, then explain why.
Of course children get frustrated, they have no power over what happens in their lives and when they are mismanaged by parents and carers their only way of asserting some autonomy is by defiance or rebellion.
I think the way parents respond will necessarily change depending on the age and understanding of the child.
A little baby cries because she needs mummy, a toddler cries out of frustration or bewilderment and needs either a simple explanation or comfort. Or, principally distraction, which solves a multitude of tricky situations. And older children need calm explanations as to why certain behaviours are unacceptable and what will happen if they continue.
Being a parent, really is the hardest job in the world and I think we all do our best.
Often we don’t fully agree with what our children do, but the easiest way is to say ‘yes of course,’ and then be firm, fair and loving in our own style.
In my family, DD is very strict about food, no sugar etc and DS is too lenient (in my view). When they eat at ours it’s a happy medium, sensible mains and all vegetables must be eaten otherwise no pudding which is alway fruit and yoghurt and then something that I have baked.
I’ve had no complaints. Yet!
I certainly agree that all children, without exception, need boundaries and I also think that it doesn’t really matter if those boundaries are widely or narrowly set. What matters is consistency. What children really hate is unfairness, so, if a sanction is the consequence of bad behaviour, it needs to be implemented (however, never threaten anything you can’t carry out!) and if there is a reason for prohibiting something, then explain why.
Of course children get frustrated, they have no power over what happens in their lives and when they are mismanaged by parents and carers their only way of asserting some autonomy is by defiance or rebellion.
I think the way parents respond will necessarily change depending on the age and understanding of the child.
A little baby cries because she needs mummy, a toddler cries out of frustration or bewilderment and needs either a simple explanation or comfort. Or, principally distraction, which solves a multitude of tricky situations. And older children need calm explanations as to why certain behaviours are unacceptable and what will happen if they continue.
Being a parent, really is the hardest job in the world and I think we all do our best.
Often we don’t fully agree with what our children do, but the easiest way is to say ‘yes of course,’ and then be firm, fair and loving in our own style.
In my family, DD is very strict about food, no sugar etc and DS is too lenient (in my view). When they eat at ours it’s a happy medium, sensible mains and all vegetables must be eaten otherwise no pudding which is alway fruit and yoghurt and then something that I have baked.
I’ve had no complaints. Yet!


Comment